🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women joined a collective professional network test this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."